Everything you need to know about NSW SEPP embodied carbon reporting requirements — from compliance pathways to how Nezo automates the entire process.
New South Wales has introduced sustainability requirements for buildings through the Sustainable Buildings State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP), administered by the NSW Government through the planning system. The policy requires developers, designers and consultants to measure and report the embodied carbon associated with construction materials used in certain new developments.
In Australia, construction activity and building materials contribute up to 24% of national greenhouse gas emissions. Addressing these emissions is essential if the sector is to meet national and global climate targets.
SEPP forms part of Australia's broader climate response and aligns with commitments under the Paris Agreement. By requiring carbon measurement within the planning process, SEPP represents an important step toward data-driven, lower-carbon construction.
There are two main compliance pathways under the NSW Sustainable Buildings SEPP, depending on whether a project is residential or non-residential.
Non-residential projects follow the NABERS pathway. Material quantities are quantified and used to calculate embodied carbon for modules A1–A3. The assessment must be completed or verified by a NABERS Assessor, Quantity Surveyor, or suitably qualified design professional.
Residential projects follow the simplified BASIX pathway. BASIX uses grouped material categories and standard emissions factors, reducing the amount of detailed reporting required. A compliance certificate is generated and lodged on the NSW Planning Portal.
Embodied carbon reporting was formally introduced through SEPP in 2024. In March 2026, the NSW Department of Planning released an Embodied Carbon Technical Note, signalling that mandatory reporting is now imminent. Here's how the timeline looks:
NSW Government introduces the Sustainable Buildings State Environmental Planning Policy, establishing the legislative framework for embodied carbon reporting.
Embodied carbon reporting formally introduced through SEPP. Absence of a detailed delivery framework delayed practical implementation within the planning approval process.
NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure releases critical guidance on how embodied carbon measurement and reporting will operate within the planning system. The operational framework is now largely in place.
Mandatory reporting requirements are likely to be formally activated for both residential and non-residential new buildings, as well as major building modifications. Submissions must now also identify decisions that demonstrate consideration of lower-carbon materials.
With a 3-year review cycle, the policy direction points toward full life-cycle carbon assessment and performance thresholds — potentially introducing carbon caps for new buildings.
The implications are significant across the construction sector. Who will be affected?
In simple terms, the challenge comes down to Time and Data. Here's where teams experience the most friction when completing embodied carbon reporting:
Design teams operate under tight deadlines and fee pressures. Introducing carbon reporting means finding time to locate, interpret and apply complex environmental data — often while the programme is already under pressure.
Carbon data is frequently buried inside EPD PDFs, stored across large databases, presented in inconsistent formats, and disconnected from other design metrics like cost and weight. This fragmentation makes meaningful comparison difficult.
Research suggests 60–80% of a project's carbon and cost outcomes are locked in during early design, yet most carbon reporting workflows are structured for compliance later in the project — measuring rather than influencing outcomes.
In practice, the reporting process often becomes highly manual. Teams spend significant time preparing material quantities, matching materials to emission factors, and formatting results into compliance reports — a labour-intensive, error-prone process.
Carbon reporting expertise often becomes concentrated in one or two specialists. Training on current market tools can exceed 50 hours, with continual use needed to maintain knowledge. If that person leaves, internal capability quickly disappears.
The industry needs clean, structured carbon data integrated directly into design workflows — connected with cost and material quantities — so designers understand the consequences of their decisions immediately. Carbon reporting must be democratised.
Nezo is built specifically for the design environment, enabling architects and engineers to measure cost, carbon, and material performance directly inside their modelling process. Rather than adding another reporting task, Nezo automates the heavy lifting and turns performance data into a real-time design tool.
Nezo connects directly to Revit, Archicad and SketchUp, automatically generating detailed schedules of material quantities from your design model. Eliminates delays waiting for manual quantity take-offs — from concept geometry onwards.
Once your design is synchronised, Nezo instantly connects material quantities to verified performance datasets — showing embodied carbon performance, construction cost impacts and material weight implications simultaneously.
Instantly compare material substitutions, evaluate alternative structural or façade strategies, and identify opportunities to reduce cost and carbon simultaneously — all without redesigning the project multiple times.
Nezo automatically generates compliance outputs for NABERS Embodied Carbon and Green Star Carbon Reporting frameworks, drastically reducing the manual burden of preparing documentation for planning approvals.
Key questions about SEPP embodied carbon reporting requirements answered.
Embodied carbon reporting applies to:
The current reporting framework focuses on A1–A3 embodied carbon emissions, commonly referred to as "cradle-to-gate" carbon measurement. This covers:
The reporting framework focuses on key structural and envelope materials that typically drive the majority of embodied carbon in buildings, including:
Embodied carbon reports generally need to be prepared or verified by a qualified professional, such as:
Yes. The Embodied Carbon Technical Note (March 2026) indicates that submissions should not only report carbon quantities but also identify design or specification decisions that demonstrate consideration of lower-carbon materials or construction methods. This marks an early shift from carbon accounting toward active decarbonisation.
If the required reporting is missing or if the constructed materials significantly differ from the approved submission, planning authorities may require:
Nezo automates material quantification, carbon analysis and compliance reporting — so your team can focus on designing better buildings.